Focused capability · Data & systems integration · CRM / ERP
Make your CRM, ERP, and tools exchange reliable information.
We connect CRMs, ERPs, databases, outreach tools, APIs, and internal services with deterministic pipelines and explicit failure handling—so teams stop reconciling the same records by hand.
Duplicate or incomplete records across CRM and ops tools
Brittle point-to-point automations
No shared source of truth for operational data
Manual reconciliation between sales, ops, and finance systems
Who this is for / when to hire
Hire systems integration when CRM, ERP, spreadsheets, and outreach tools disagree—and brittle Zapier/Make-style links or one-off scripts are the only glue. Fit: B2B operations that need a reliable path between systems of record, with retries, monitoring, and ownership—not another silent sync that fails on Friday.
What we build
CRM ↔ ERP / database / internal API sync with explicit contracts
Inbound and outbound pipelines with validation and idempotency
Workflow engines that replace fragile point-to-point links
Monitoring, alerting, and runbooks so failures are visible
We start from the data path that hurts (leads, orders, inventory, tickets)—not from a vendor catalogue.
How engagement works
Audit systems and flows → define contracts and failure modes → build versioned integrations → launch with monitoring and handoff docs. First scope proves one reliable corridor between systems.
What you receive
Cleaner data movement between systems, visible errors, and less manual reconciliation between teams.
01
System and data-flow audit
02
Versioned integrations and retry policies
03
Monitoring, alerting, and runbooks
04
Clear contracts between CRM / ERP / internal services
Proof from related work
Proof from related work
Client names can stay private. Outcomes and architecture stay concrete. Lab demos are labeled as such.
Client delivery
Inbound Revenue Switch
Inbound Revenue Switch — 82-node inbound router with CRM sync and team alerts
Yes—when the operation needs a reliable corridor between those systems and adjacent tools (APIs, databases, outreach). Scope follows the data path that is breaking.
Will you rip out our current tools?
Usually no. We connect and stabilize first. Replacement only when the constraint requires it.
How is this different from Zapier or Make?
Those tools are fine until logic, volume, or failure handling outgrow them. We build versioned, monitored integrations your team can operate—sometimes alongside iPaaS, sometimes instead of it for the critical path.
What do we get at handoff?
Contracts, retry policies, monitoring, alerting, and runbooks—not a undocumented script.
Can we start with one sync only?
Yes. One corridor, production-quality, then expand.
A useful first conversation
In 15 minutes, we map the constraint and decide the useful next step.
Systems integration, data pipeline—or no build at all.